4s.
Protocol finality vs operational confirmations
Both statements can be true: the protocol provides one-block finality, while high-value business workflows may choose a larger confirmation policy.
Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: /llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
How to think about c8ntinuum finality, validator agreement, and confirmation policy.
4s.
| Concept | Meaning | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol finality | A committed block is final after one block under standard CometBFT assumptions. | Smart contracts, wallets, and normal dapp UX can treat included transactions as final. |
| Operational confirmations | A business policy that waits additional blocks even after protocol finality. | Exchanges and custodians may wait 60 confirmations to absorb scanner lag, provider delay, and operational risk. |
| Area | Effect |
|---|---|
| Finality | Transactions are final after one committed block under standard CometBFT assumptions. |
| Expected block time | 4s |
| Reorganizations | Application logic should not expect Ethereum-style probabilistic reorg handling. |
| Validators | Native staking and validator state are exposed through Cosmos modules and selected precompiles. |
| JSON-RPC | Mining-related Ethereum RPC methods return compatibility values rather than proof-of-work state. |
| Indexing | Indexers should still use cursors, receipt checks, and retry logic because infrastructure can lag even when consensus has finalized. |